Up to Discussions in JetBrains AppCode
2 Replies Last post: Jan 23, 2013 9:40 PM by Giampaolo Trapasso  
Giampaolo Trapasso Newbie
Giampaolo Trapasso
8 posts since
Oct 12, 2012
Currently Being Moderated

Jan 22, 2013 9:45 PM

Memory occupation (EAP 2.0)

Hi to all.

First of all my compliments to developer, EAP 2.0 is faster than 1.6.x family. I'm glad to work with it.

 

I just need to know how much memory does your installation consume. At the moment I have 1.65gb virtual memory and 1.25gb real memory. I think that these values are, of course, dependent of project size. But I'm curious about your values (EAP or  not).

 

 

gp

Anton Makeev JetBrains
Anton Makeev
1,094 posts since
Dec 19, 2006
Currently Being Moderated
Jan 23, 2013 4:00 PM in response to: Giampaolo Trapasso
Re: Memory occupation (EAP 2.0)

Giampaolo,

AppCode 2.0 EAP currently consumes more memory, than 1.6 due to reworked indices. We are working on the optimization and hope to fix this problem soon.

Report Abuse
Giampaolo Trapasso Newbie
Giampaolo Trapasso
8 posts since
Oct 12, 2012
Currently Being Moderated
Jan 23, 2013 9:40 PM in response to: Anton Makeev
Re: Memory occupation (EAP 2.0)

Thank you for your reply Anton.

I wasn't complaining about memory occupation. Just wanted to know yours.

 

gp

Report Abuse

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...